Trump's Claim Of A Mandate Is Overstated
The math just doesn't add up.
Michael Mechanic in Mother Jones challenges the notion that Trump has a "mandate" simply because he won the election. After all, Trump received less than half the popular vote, which is less than one-third of registered voters.
Furthermore, polling shows that many of Trump's executive orders have little popular support; e.g., 36% support for pardoning the January 6th rioters, and 37% support for tariffs on goods from Canada. Hardly a mandate.
Mechanic gives us a brief history of U.S. presidents claiming mandates going back to Andrew Jackson – who tried to use his "mandate" to destroy the central bank.

2,399 words
"Mandates are typically invoked, [political scientist] Azari has observed, when a president is on the defensive or when he seeks to vastly expand his powers."
Source tags: Mother Jones, Michael Mechanic